Laboratory Tests | NMHC | NOX | NH3 | CO | PN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.510 | Cold Test | |||||
6.510 | Warm Test | |||||
1.910 | Cold Ambient test | |||||
0.010 | Highway | |||||
Road test | ||||||
5.810 | On-Road Drive | |||||
0.08 | On-Road Heavy Load | |||||
3.25 | On-Road Light Load | |||||
3.15 | On-Road Short Trip | |||||
1.02 | Congestion | |||||
Robustness |
Laboratory Tests | Energy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
4.810 | Cold Test | |||
5.410 | Warm Test | |||
3.910 | Cold Ambient test | |||
2.610 | Highway | |||
Consumption | Driving Range | |||
Average | 7.5l100 km | 758km | ||
Worst-Case | 8.6l100 km | 652km |
Greenhouse Gases | CO2 | N2O | CH4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.87 | Cold Test | |||
3.27 | Warm Test | |||
2.57 | Cold Ambient test | |||
2.17 | Highway |
Our verdict
Originally launched in 2012 as Mazda's offering in the highly competitive compact crossover SUV segment, the car tested here is the second generation model released in 2017. With a 121 kW 2.0 litre Skyactiv engine, the car has a three-way catalyst but no gasoline particulate filter. Under normal test conditions, the car performs well for pollutant abatement, with good control of most emissions. However, when the engine is pushed, as it is in Green NCAP's robustness tests, emissions control deteriorates and values of CO and particulates become very high. However, emissions of some important greenhouse gases are tightly controlled and the vehicle scores relatively well in that part of the assessment. All in all, a balanced performance that earns the CX-5 a two-star overall rating.