Laboratory Tests | NMHC | NOX | NH3 | CO | PN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.810 | Cold Test | |||||
7.110 | Warm Test | |||||
8.110 | Highway | |||||
Cold Ambient Test | Does not qualify for additional robustness testing | |||||
Road Test | ||||||
7.310 | On-Road Drive | |||||
3.45 | On-Road Short Trip | |||||
On-Road Heavy Load | Does not qualify for additional robustness testing | |||||
On-Road Light Load | Does not qualify for additional robustness testing | |||||
Congestion | Does not qualify for additional robustness testing |
Laboratory Tests | Energy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
4.110 | Cold Test | |||
4.410 | Warm Test | |||
1.810 | Highway | |||
Cold Ambient Test | Does not qualify for additional robustness testing | |||
Consumption | Driving Range | |||
Average | 7.6l100 km | 717km | ||
Worst-Case | 8.9l100 km | 605km |
Greenhouse Gases | CO2 | N2O | CH4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.210 | Cold Test | |||
2.710 | Warm Test | |||
0.010 | Highway | |||
Cold Ambient Test | Does not qualify for additional robustness testing |
Our verdict
August 2023: The result of this car been updated. Previously reported Ammonia (NH3) values were incorrect owing to a technical error with the equipment at the test laboratory and a correction has been applied.
The Renault Kangoo starts with the disadvantage of a non-aerodynamic body. Like other vehicles tested in 2022, its performance in the greenhouse gases index is the poorest of the three areas of assessment. Measurements for energy efficiency and CO2 emissions at the tailpipe are just slightly above the officially reported values. Pollutants are managed quite well, helping the car to boost its overall performance. Overall, the Kangoo scores a creditable 2½ stars out of 5.