Laboratory Tests | NMHC | NOX | NH3 | CO | PN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.010 | Cold Test | |||||
10.010 | Warm Test | |||||
10.010 | Highway | |||||
10.010 | Cold Ambient Test | |||||
Road Test | ||||||
10.010 | On-Road Drive | |||||
5.05 | On-Road Short Trip | |||||
8.08 | On-Road Heavy Load | |||||
5.05 | On-Road Light Load | |||||
2.02 | Congestion |
Laboratory Tests | Energy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
10.010 | Cold Test | 17.1kWh100 km | ||
10.010 | Warm Test | 17.4kWh100 km | ||
9.210 | Highway | 25.9kWh100 km | ||
8.610 | Cold Ambient Test | 29.9kWh100 km | ||
Consumption | Driving Range | |||
Average | 20.2kWh100 km | 451km | ||
Worst-Case | 29.9kWh100 km | 293km |
Greenhouse Gases | CO2 | N2O | CH4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.010 | Cold Test | |||
10.010 | Warm Test | |||
9.710 | Highway | |||
9.010 | Cold Ambient Test |
Our verdict
The Enyaq tested here is an established electric SUV by Škoda, equipped with a new-generation battery. It appeals to many, but especially those looking for a big EV at reasonable price. The large battery (77 kWh declared capacity) enables a range of approx. 510 km according to the WLTP+ procedure and addresses most people's range anxiety. But even during highway driving or in very cold and unfavourable conditions, the range remains around 300 km. The consumption values in the Cold Ambient Test and in the Highway Test are notably higher than in the standard WLTP+ lab Tests, but are still in the range of other efficient EVs and better than those of other large electric SUVs tested by Green NCAP. When charging the vehicle with 11 kW (standard Green NCAP procedure), 89.5 % of the energy taken from the grid is available at the battery output side, which is in line with other well performing electric cars. During a full discharge from 100% to 0% the battery supplies more than 78 kWh, exceeding the official claim of 77 kWh by Škoda. The Enyaq scores a well-deserved 5 Green Stars with an Average Score of 96%.