Laboratory Tests | NMHC | NOX | NH3 | CO | PN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.210 | Cold Test | |||||
6.710 | Warm Test | |||||
5.110 | Cold Ambient test | |||||
5.510 | Highway | |||||
Road test | ||||||
6.710 | On-Road Drive | |||||
5.48 | On-Road Heavy Load | |||||
3.45 | On-Road Light Load | |||||
4.35 | On-Road Short Trip | |||||
2.02 | Congestion | |||||
Robustness |
Laboratory Tests | Energy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
7.210 | Cold Test | |||
7.410 | Warm Test | |||
6.210 | Cold Ambient test | |||
5.210 | Highway | |||
Consumption | Driving Range | |||
Average | 5.8l100 km | 885km | ||
Worst-Case | 6.8l100 km | 734km |
Greenhouse Gases | CO2 | N2O | CH4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
3.87 | Cold Test | |||
4.07 | Warm Test | |||
3.67 | Cold Ambient test | |||
2.87 | Highway |
Our verdict
August 2023: The result of this car been updated. Previously reported Ammonia (NH3) values were incorrect owing to a technical error with the equipment at the test laboratory and a correction has been applied.
The soon-to-be-replaced third generation Škoda Fabia is tested here with the 3 cylinder 1.0 litre turbocharged direct injection engine. In the past, such engines might have had issues with the number of particulate they emitted but a gasoline particulate filter (GPF) takes care of the problem, and to good effect. Emissions of particulates are never excessive, even in the more challenging tests. Emissions of NOx and CO are very well controlled, especially in the road tests. The story remains good when we look at energy efficiency, with the small engine emitting low values of CO2. This serves the car well in the Energy Efficiency index too, and excellent control of laughing gas, N2O and of Methane, CH4, contribute to a good index of 5 in this part of the assessment. Overall, the average index is only a little short of gaining the Fabia an extra half-star but it emerges from the tests with a very creditable 3 star rating.